UX & UI Case Study

Redesigning the FutureFunds landing page.

Rebuilding a financial planning page around clarity, hierarchy, and trust.

Project Overview

A landing page that earns the visitor's trust before it asks for anything.

Client

FutureFunds (fictional)

Project

GRA-470

Tool

Figma

Deliverable

UX/UI redesign and usability test plan


The Challenge

The right features, in the wrong order.

FutureFunds is a financial planning company for young professionals, spanning three personas that range from financially confident to overwhelmed. The original wireframes had every feature the client asked for, but they pushed visitors to book a call before the page ever explained who the company was or why it could be trusted.

A heuristic review found problems across all six core UX principles, with hierarchy as the biggest failure. Cards, graphs, and forms went unlabeled, navigation arrows looked identical with no explanation, the booking form asked for a full mailing address, and dense spacing left users unsure where to begin.

Real testers drove every fix. One said they could not tell what the company did before being prompted to schedule. Another could not identify what the graph or form even was. Each change in the redesign traces back to something a specific user struggled with.

The Redesign

A page that introduces, then invites.

The revised design follows a deliberate top-to-bottom narrative where every section earns its place. Trust signals arrive early, the company explains itself before any ask, and the tools are clearly labeled and simple to use.

Hero section immediately establishes who FutureFunds is.

Services map directly to all three persona needs.

Calculator is clearly labeled, with sliders and a live result.

Testimonials move below services, where they add context.

Scheduler is simplified to plain time-slot buttons.

Blog closes the page with educational value.

FutureFunds desktop landing page redesign

Desktop

FutureFunds mobile landing page redesign

Mobile

Problem and Solution

Every change answers a real complaint.

What users said
What changed
The scheduler appeared before any company introduction.
Moved below services and testimonials.
The booking form asked for a full mailing address.
Replaced with simple time-slot buttons.
Reviews felt out of place at the top of the page.
Testimonials now follow the services section.
Cards and the graph had no labels or explanation.
Every section is clearly titled and explained.
No whitespace, so the page felt cluttered.
Generous spacing and clear section breaks.
Buttons were unlabeled, identical arrows.
Every button has a clear, descriptive label.

Visual System

Color & typography.

Color palette
#23C686Brand green
#1C1C1CCharcoal
#5C5C57Slate
#F4F5F4Mist

Green signals growth and action and is reserved for headings and key buttons. Charcoal carries the structure, so the green never has to shout.

Typography, Inter
HeaderExtraBold
Plan with confidence
Sub-headerSemiBold
Financial planning, made clear
BodyRegular
Personalized guidance for young professionals, from loans to retirement.
CTABold
Book a consultation

Why Figma

The right tool for high-fidelity work.

High fidelity, no code

Shows how the final product looks and behaves before a single line is built.

Desktop and mobile together

Both versions live in one file, designed side by side for a consistent system.

Built for handoff

Real-time comments and clean PNG export for presentations and development.


Usability Test Plan

Proving the fixes actually worked.

01 Understanding

Do users get it?

Can a visitor quickly tell what FutureFunds offers and who it is for?

02 Usability

Can they use it?

Can users find and operate the calculator and scheduler without confusion?

03 Organization

Does it feel logical?

Does the new layout read as organized compared to the original wireframes?

Participants
  • Five young professionals, ages 25 to 35
  • Range from financially confident to overwhelmed
  • Screened to match the FutureFunds audience
  • Moderated, think-aloud sessions, about 30 minutes each
Tasks
  • First impressions: what is this and who is it for?
  • Find the tool that shows how savings could grow
  • Show how you would schedule a time to talk
  • Interpret the articles section, and would you click it?

Bias is controlled with neutral facilitator language, open-ended scenarios rather than step-by-step instructions, and a reminder that there are no wrong answers. Recordings are reviewed afterward for unintentional cues, and findings feed back into the design before any development.

The Full Presentation

Twelve slides, start to finish.

The complete critique, redesign, and usability test plan, presented as a UX and UI training deck.

View the Full Presentation